National Citizens Coalition Blog

Back to Main listings


NCC Blog: The most important budget in a decade

With the Olympics finished, our politicians are gearing up to resume the daily grind of Question Period.  Don’t let that turn you off of politics though, because the federal budget is set to be released now and it is the most important budget in a decade.

The National Citizens Coalition has been very clear about what Canadians want to see in this budget.  We have launched the 5-0-1 Campaign to bring Canadians better government.

  • 5    At both the federal and provincial levels we have been campaigning for a 5% pay cut for all elected officials. The time has come for leadership from the top, and the many Canadians who have lost their jobs or had to tighten their belts over the past year are speaking with one voice on this issue.
  • 0    The NCC is also advocating zero-based budgeting at all levels of government. This practice rejects the unquestioned annual growth of government budgets that has become commonplace in Canada. Instead all budgets will be built from zero annually to avoid redundant expenses and to ensure value for tax-payers.
  • 1    Our provincial and federal debt combined is approaching $1-trillion. The only way to bring this under control is to limit government spending. Across the board, we have been campaigning to limit government spending growth to 1% per year. The time to reduce the public debt is now. We are also advocating only one new hiring for every two retiring public servants. This will be an effective way to reduce the size of the public service, whose numbers have continued to unnecessarily grow throughout these difficult economic times.

The NCC has been very vocal about what we expect to see from our government in this budget. NCC President Peter Coleman has been featured on news programs and talk shows across the country as the budget approaches. Please click here to see a recent TV clip.

The National Citizens Coalition has been at the forefront of these issues, and we will continue to fight for Canadian taxpayers. Please click here to read our latest Press Release on the upcoming federal budget.  Across the country Canadians are fed-up with the lack of government action to get our finances in order. Taxpayers’ money and trust have been abused, and our politicians need to know that this year a line in the sand has been drawn and Canadians are saying ‘no more.’

Stand up for Canadian taxpayers by supporting our 5-0-1 campaign and its objectives. Please click here to donate.

Best Regards,

Peter Coleman
President, National Citizens Coalition


Comments

Ted Brewer says:

The 5-0-1 plan makes great sense to me. As a 77 year old retiree, living on a total pension of $1381 a month, my wife and I have no choice but to draw down our retirement savings and continue working at our small home business in order to keep our heads above water. Now, with the HST looming on the horizon this summer, a 9% increase announced in BC hydro bills, and other inflationary trends in the future, things could get very tight indeed, for us and for thousands of oother retirees. It is time government tightened their collective belts, quit spending as if there is no tomorrow, and quit giving unneeded raises to their employees.

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 1:08 pm

Cathy says:

Several other measures to give us back our freedom and security (both financial and physical): -Bring all of our troops home from everywhere.
-withdraw the charter from the central bank and repeal legal tender laws, to allow competition in currency.
-allow for private provision of all health care.
-sell off the assets of Canada Post and put an end to this fiasco.
I have many more points but just these few measures would go a long way to removing the large burden from our shoulders.

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 1:16 pm

Jack Bailey says:

You have dne very well I would say. The only questionable item is zero base budgetting. This idea is sound in principle, unfortunately it does not work very well. I spent several years with the B.C.

You have done very well in my opinion. The only questionable item is zero base budgetting. This idea seems to be sound in principle, however it does not work very well. I spent several years with the B.C.Forest Service when zero base was tried, unfortunately it did not work very well.

forest Service

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 1:47 pm

Alastair Stevens says:

A significant cut in government spending could be made by trimming Official Bilingualism or eliminating it altogether. Eliminate the Office of the Commissioner for Official Languages. Various auxhiliary positions for Languages could also be eliminated. Colectively this would save a colossal amount of our tax money.

Also have proposed Bill C- 428 deleted, the amending of AOS payments.

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 1:55 pm

DougB says:

Here we go again, EVERYBODY knows better how to run our lives, than we do (in some cases, it may be true).

Two things to consider:
1) ALL taxes come from the pocket of the taxpayer. There is not a business on earth that can actually PAY taxes, without going broke, eventually. All they do is COLLECT taxes (at great expense), from their customers. That means that product prices need to be higher than otherwise necessary, which makes the products less competitive world wide. That means smaller markets, which means fewer sales, which means fewer opportunities to create jobs, which means less taxes get paid. It can also mean that companies go broke, and/or move somewhere else where the taxes are not as expensive. Net result, is less taxes for the government to waste (but they will anyway).

2) Since companies COLLECT taxes, they must also submit them to the government. Here we have a HUGE bureaucracy to be sure that companies submit the taxes to the government. We also have a HUGE bureaucracy to be sure that the average taxpayer also submits his/her taxes. Since ALL of that money comes out of the pocket of the taxpayer, it would seem logical to eliminate all business taxes (including the GST/HST), and all of the bureaucracy that goes along with it, and let the taxpayer pay what they must. True, individual taxes would probably rise, but the overall tax burden would drop dramatically, and the government would end up with more money to work with. Of course, it would take a while for all of those bureaucrats, and accountants, to find other jobs, but I suspect that there would be enough to go around.

There is also the idea that it would be smart to spend money now, that we don’t have, which is is absolutely INSANE. There is likely no way that Canada will ever get out of the debt hole if they continue to throw money around like a drunken sailor. The “recent TV clip” demonstrates the utter disregard (or, perhaps it is total ignorance) that far too many people show for how an economy works. The idea that we need to throw more money after failed policies, that got us into the debt hole in the first place, and pay later, is simply perpetuating the problem. One argument, that always amuses me (well, it would if it wasn’t so damned serious), is that Canada needs a country wide daycare program. We wouldn’t need that, if people could keep enough of their income to be able to have one parent stay home with the kids. As it stands today, I would bet that many people actually end up with LESS money, when two parents are working, than they would if one stayed home, and adding to the tax burden (where else would you get the money to pay for it) just makes it worse for everybody. Of course, there is always the argument that people have the right to work. They also have the right to not have kids, or pay from their own pockets, if work is that important to them.

Having partly recovered from previous experiments in “buy now, pay later”, the government has now spent us right back to where they started. It will take MANY years to work our way out of the hole, and there is a very good chance that we will just be scratching the surface when the next downturn comes along, and it all starts again with an even bigger debt.

The current methods are not working. Government is probably 6 times the size that can actually be justified (that also means the number of MPs and Senators), people pay far too much in taxes, which are wasted at every turn, and there are still people who are demanding more (more spending, and more debt). I don’t know where they think it all comes from, but I know that it ALL comes from the taxpayer’s private pocket (or, in the case of debt, their children’s pockets). I also know that it is very poor return on the dollar, with a very large price tag.

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 2:36 pm

LJH says:

I am hoping to hear that the Government is going to take another shot at ending the Canadian Wheat Board monopoly in today’s throne speech

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 2:47 pm

Cathy says:

Ted Brewer
I am sorry that you and your wife cannot enjoy your well-deserved retirement. You have every right to be very angry that your government continually devalues your savings. It doesn’t have to be that way. Before central banking, people did not have to be brilliant speculators to make their savings grow. We have to stop believing the lie that inflation is good and necessary and start to view money like any other good and take it out of the hands of government.

submitted on March 3rd, 2010 at 3:10 pm

Warren says:

Kudos on the 5-0-1 Campaign ideas.

If the Govt did nothing more than that (all else, status quo), we would all benefit significantly.

Hopefully, the NCC alumni are listening, one in particular. (BTW, he heard you already on the 5% salary cuts to politicians! Good start!)

submitted on March 4th, 2010 at 10:12 am

Scurvy Dog says:

Anybody watch the video with the NCC Pres? Good Job Peter. Do we want to end up with the financial situation in Greece? The other guest on the show mentioned the 50s and all working hard for the Country we want. Well what is the country we want?

What about household debt pushing more families closer to bankruptcy? The higher taxes will encourage increased black market performance and increased theft.

Security has been hired at certain stores around my town-pathetic. They tell me they are hired because of the economy and more theft is the excuse they have feed themselves! What about all these social programs that have been in existence for many years? We advertise charities everytime they scream for more money. Enough venting here. lol

submitted on March 4th, 2010 at 10:31 am

Gillespie, Stephen says:

Today I wrote a commentary about spending by Farm Credit Canada which was published in the London Free Press Tuesday March 2, 2010. Section A and A7. For some reason upon submission response shows E-Mail(will not be published). Stephen Gillespie.

submitted on March 4th, 2010 at 1:40 pm

Gillespie, Stephen says:

Is anyone aware that a member of Parliament is trying to get an amendment through so that Old Age Security will be paid to New Comers after being here for only 3 years. Currently it is 10 years. Taxpayers should speak up quickly on this one! Stephen Gillespie.

submitted on March 4th, 2010 at 1:51 pm

Ted Brewer says:

I have seen information on that bill granting OAP to immigrants after only 3 years living in Canada, but what else would you expect from an immigrant Indian MP and a super Liberal, ex-NDP like Bob Rae. It annoys the hell out of me but I do not think it will go through as long as the Conservatives form the government. It scares me to think of a Liberal government passing it though!

submitted on March 5th, 2010 at 1:18 pm

Leave a Comment